The amended complaint alleges that the defendants each unlawfully has fixed prices for restaurant meals by entering into restrictive agreements with restaurants that preclude those restaurants from charging lower prices offplatform. Facts This matter arises from a putative class action involving the contractual relationships between restaurants and online ordering platforms for restaurant meals. (Dkt 72 Dkt 76) For the reasons set forth below, defendants' motions are denied. ('Postmates') to compel plaintiffs Mariam Davitashvili, Adam Bensimon, Philip Eliades, Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi, and Nathan Obey (the 'Platform Plaintiffs') to arbitrate their claims, based on arbitration provisions in defendants' respective terms of use. ('Uber' or 'Uber Eats'), and Postmates Inc. This matter is before the Court on the motions of Grub hub, Inc. Ruffino COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Attorneys for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. Ruffino COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Attorneys for Defendant Postmates Inc.

Lent Evan Kreiner SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER, & FLOM LLP Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK-JW Document 103 Filed 03/16/23 of 30 2 Derek Ludwin Stacey K.

Hochstadt Luna Ngan Barrington WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Attorneys for Defendant Grub hub Inc. Roche Edward Normand Stephen Lagos ROCHE CYRULNIK FREEDMAN LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs David J. x MEMORANDUM OPINION Appearances: Gregory A. 20-cv-3000 (LAK) and consolidated case GRUBHUB INC., et al., Defendants. 103 Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK-JW Document 103 Filed 03/16/23 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -x MARIAM DAVITASHVILI, et al., Plaintiffs, V.

Is grubhub the same as seamless